Heritage interpretation and tourist experience at geosites: evidence from the Puyango Petrified Forest
Keywords:
Geotourism, heritage interpretation, visitor experience, protected areas, tourist satisfaction, geological heritageAbstract
Geotourism is a form of nature-based tourism that integrates geological heritage conservation, environmental education, and sustainable development. This study analyzes visitors’ perceptions of the quality of the tourism experience and heritage interpretation at the Puyango Petrified Forest in Ecuador. A mixed-methods approach was employed, with a descriptive scope and a non-experimental research design. Data were collected through direct observation of interpretive activities and the administration of structured questionnaires to domestic and international visitors. The instrument addressed variables related to infrastructure, accessibility, service quality, guide performance, environmental interpretation, overall satisfaction, and intention to recommend the destination. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative information complemented the assessment of the interpretive practices observed. The results reveal high levels of satisfaction with the natural heritage, staff service, and overall conditions of the visitor experience. However, limitations were identified regarding the depth of heritage interpretation, the use of innovative educational tools, and certain basic visitor services. The study concludes that strengthening interpretation through participatory strategies, digital technologies, and experiential methodologies can enhance learning, visitors’ connection with geological heritage, and the overall quality of the tourism experience, while contributing to the conservation and sustainable development of the geosite.
Downloads
References
Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., Lee, J., Packer, J., & Sneddon, J. (2018). Visitors' values and environmental learning outcomes at wildlife attractions: Implications for interpretive practice. Tourism Management, 64, 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.07.015
Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Sutherland, L. A. (2011). Visitors’ memories of wildlife tourism: Implications for the design of powerful interpretive experiences. Tourism Management, 32(4), 770–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.012
Cheng, Y., Hu, F., Wang, J., Wang, G., Innes, J. L., Xie, Y., & Wang, G. (2022). Visitor satisfaction and behavioral intentions in nature-based tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study from Zhangjiajie National Forest Park, China. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 10(1), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.03.001
Chi, C. G. Q., & Qu, H. (2008). Examining the structural relationships of destination image, tourist satisfaction and destination loyalty: An integrated approach. Tourism Management, 29(4), 624–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.06.007
Dowling, R. K. (2021). Geotourism and geoparks. En R. K. Dowling & D. Newsome (Eds.), Handbook of geotourism. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Eagles, P. F. J., McCool, S. F., & Haynes, C. D. (2003). Turismo sostenible en áreas protegidas: Directrices de planificación y gestión (A. Phillips, Ed.). Organización Mundial del Turismo.
Ham, S. H. (2013). Interpretation: Making a difference on purpose. Fulcrum Publishing.
Herrera Anangonó, R. C., Delgado Campuzano, D. V., Moreira Espinoza, J. A., & Toala Tuárez, P. J. (2021). La reactivación turística post COVID-19 de las áreas naturales protegidas y su incidencia en la mejora de la experiencia de los turistas en el Ecuador. Siembra, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.29166/siembra.v8i2.3071
Newsome, D., & Dowling, R. K. (2025). Geoheritage and geotourism. En E. Reynard & J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: Assessment, protection, and management (2nd ed., pp. 479–502). Elsevier.
Ólafsdóttir, R., & Tverijonaite, E. (2024). Geotourism, visitor engagement and sustainable destination management. Geoheritage.
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2015). Directrices operativas para los Geoparques Mundiales de la UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391354_spa
Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy. Harvard Business School Press.
World Tourism Organization (2021). Barómetro OMT del Turismo Mundial y anexo estadístico, septiembre 2021. UNWTO. https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/epdf/10.18111/wtobarometeresp.2021.19.1.5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 María Isabel Bastidas-Andrade, Arlene Lazo-Serrano, Raquel Castillo-Flores

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Revista UGC agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright
Authors retain unrestricted copyright to their work. Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. To this end, they assign the journal non-exclusive exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication, and transformation). Authors may enter into additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal, provided that acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal is given.
© The authors.
2. License
The articles are published in the journal under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). The terms can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en
This license allows:
- Sharing: Copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format.
- Adapting: Remixing, transforming, and building upon the material.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes were made. You may do this in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses or sponsors your use.
- NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your creation under the same license as the original work.
There are no additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.





