Crisis of legitimacy in Ecuadorian constitutional justice due to the misuse of precautionary measures

Authors

Keywords:

Criminal enforcement, due process, legal certainty, constitutional justice, judicial legitimacy

Abstract

This paper analyzes the legal and constitutional effects of Judgment No. 12-23-JC/24 of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador, within the context of the misuse of constitutional precautionary measures to interfere with the enforcement of final criminal sentences. Using a qualitative-descriptive approach, supported by jurisprudential, normative, and doctrinal analysis, it examines how these practices have contributed to the distortion of jurisdictional guarantees, affecting the integrity of the justice system and weakening the structural principles of the rule of law. The paper identifies the constitutional limits that must be observed in the application of precautionary measures, especially in contexts where their use conflicts with the finality of judicial decisions in criminal matters. It also includes a comparative analysis with the experiences of Colombia, Peru, and Argentina, whose constitutional courts have adopted restrictive criteria regarding these practices. Finally, regulatory and jurisprudential measures are proposed aimed at restoring the balance between the effective protection of fundamental rights and respect for legality, legal certainty, and res judicata in criminal proceedings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aponte Arcila, J. E. (2022). Crisis del principio de legalidad: discusión recurrente pero necesaria en América Latina. Estado & Comunes, Revista de Políticas y Problemas Públicos, 1(14), 95–111. http://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2477-92452022000100095

Boehme, H. M., Cann, D., & Isom, D. A. (2022). Citizens’ perceptions of over-and under-policing: A look at race, ethnicity, and community characteristics. Crime & Delinquency, 68(1), 123–154. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0011128720974309

Carrasco Durán, M. (2020). La definición constitucional del derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva. Revista de Derecho Político, 1(107), 13–40. https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/derechopolitico/article/view/27182

Cruz Santos, A. E. (2022). La Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (CCE): límite de funciones estatales y ciertas críticas. Iuris Dictio, 30. https://revistas.usfq.edu.ec/index.php/iurisdictio/article/view/2540

Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. (2008). Constitucion de la Republica de Ecuador. In Registro Oficial 449. https://www.superbancos.gob.ec/bancos/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2021/11/constitucion_republica_ecuador4.pdf

Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional. (2009). Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control Constitucional (LOGJCC). Segundo Suplemento Del Registro Oficial No. 52 de 22 de Octubre de 2009. Última Reforma: Suplemento Del Registro Oficial 134, 03-02-2020. https://biblioteca.defensoria.gob.ec/handle/37000/3369

Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional. (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal, COIP. In Registro Oficial No. 180. https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared Documents/ECU/INT_CEDAW_ARL_ECU_18950_S.pdf

Espinoza-Espinoza, J. (Comp). (2023). Neoconstitucionalismo y tutela de los derechos fundamentales en el siglo XXI. Editorial Exced.

González Rincón, A. C. (2023). La ruta de ida y vuelta entre la Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos y el Sistema Interamericano: una relación para la protección de los derechos en México. Estudios Constitucionales, 21(1), 247–278. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0718-52002023000100247&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en

Medina-Peña, R., & Torres-Espinoza, J. J. (Coord.) (2024). El neoconstitucionalismo en la protección de los nuevos derechos. Sophia Editions.

Picardo González, S., & Tiscornia Algorta, A. (2023). Las medidas" anti-proceso" o" anti-cautelar": Una mirada desde el Derecho Procesal uruguayo. Revista Uruguaya de Derecho Procesal, 1–2, 139–150. https://revistas.fcu.edu.uy/index.php/rudp/article/view/4324

Rubio Núñez, R., & De Andrade Monteiro, V. (2022). Las decisiones jurisdiccionales de carácter constitucional de los organismos electorales en Iberoamérica: un difícil equilibrio. Anuario Iberoamericano de Justicia Constitucional, 26(2), 431–454. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/597980894.pdf

Terán Suárez, R. J. L. (2021). Las medidas cautelares constitucionales en Ecuador. Revista Juridica Critica y Derecho, 2(2), 1–13. https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/criticayderecho/article/view/2807

Tigua Tigua, R. R., & Barreiro Cevallos, L. E. (2024). Especialización de jueces constitucionales en las garantías jurisdiccionales en el Ecuador. Frónesis, 31(1), 88-114. https://openurl.ebsco.com/openurl?sid=ebsco:plink:scholar&id=ebsco:gcd:177785223&crl=c

Toro Castelblanco, A. S., Roa Tuta, P. A., & Vélez Castro, J. A. (2022). Objeción de conciencia en la actividad judicial. Saberes Jurídicos, 2(2), 36–49. https://umapp002.unimagdalena.edu.co/index.php/saberesjuridicos/article/view/5499

Ugartemendia Eceizabarrena, J. I. (2020). Tutela judicial efectiva y Estado de derecho en la Unión Europea y su incidencia en Administración de Justicia de los Estados miembros. Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, 46, 309–341. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7715742

Downloads

Published

2025-08-16

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Desafíos contemporáneos en la sociedad global: perspectivas jurídicas, educativas y tecnológicas (Septiembre-diciembre)

Section

Artículos

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Beatriz del Carmen Viteri-Naranjo, Luis Fernando Piñas-Piñas, Guido Javier Silva-Andrade, Hugo Mateo Hidalgo-Rosero

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in Revista UGC agree to the following terms:

1. Copyright

Authors retain unrestricted copyright to their work. Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. To this end, they assign the journal non-exclusive exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication, and transformation). Authors may enter into additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal, provided that acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal is given.

© The authors.

2. License

The articles are published in the journal under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). The terms can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en

This license allows:

  • Sharing: Copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format.
  • Adapting: Remixing, transforming, and building upon the material.

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes were made. You may do this in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses or sponsors your use.
  • NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your creation under the same license as the original work.

There are no additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.