The educational model for learning about natural resources in Natural Sciences in third grade

Authors

  • Evelyn Rocio Guiracocha-Llapa Universidad Nacional de Educación. Ecuador.
  • Karen Cristina Yunga-Coronel Universidad Nacional de Educación. Ecuador. https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8805-2352

Keywords:

Learning, instructional materials, natural sciences, case study

Abstract

The present study aimed to strengthen the learning of natural resources among third-grade Basic General Education students through the use of an educational model as a didactic resource. The study was conducted within a pragmatic paradigm, using a mixed-methods approach and a case study method. Twenty-five students participated during the 2025–2026 academic year. Quantitative data were collected through a pretest and posttest designed to identify students’ knowledge before and after the intervention. Qualitative information was obtained through direct observation and a semi-structured interview with the classroom teacher, aimed at exploring her perceptions of students’ participation, understanding, and interaction during the use of the educational model. The results showed favorable changes in students’ learning about natural resources following the intervention, accompanied by increased participation, interest, and engagement in the activities. From a qualitative perspective, the visual, hands-on, and interactive features of the educational model facilitated the identification and differentiation of natural resources, encouraged collaborative work, and helped students establish connections between the content studied and concrete situations. The integration of quantitative and qualitative findings supported a favorable assessment of this resource within the educational process. It is concluded that the educational model represents a relevant didactic alternative for strengthening the learning of natural resources by promoting a more active, participatory, and meaningful learning experience in Natural Sciences education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Álava Carpio, O., & Cedeño Casquete, X. (2023). Recursos didácticos y su incidencia en la motivación de los estudiantes [Trabajo de integración curricular, Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo].

Alvarado Bautista, E., Alvarado Santa Cruz, B., Chumán Cármen, W., & Valdera Contreras, A. (2024). Energías renovables y su impacto en el medio ambiente en la región Lambayeque. Horizonte Empresarial, 11(1), 370–380. https://revistas.uss.edu.pe/index.php/EMP/article/view/2846

Arenas, A. (2021). Métodos mixtos de investigación. Magisterio.

Arias, F. (2023). El paradigma pragmático como fundamento epistemológico de la investigación mixta: Revisión sistematizada. Educación, Arte, Comunicación: Revista Académica e Investigativa, 12(2), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.54753/eac.v12i2.2020

Bustillos Medina, C. (2024). Las maquetas en el aprendizaje significativo del área de Ciencias Naturales de los estudiantes de séptimo grado de Educación General Básica de la Unidad Educativa “Juan Pablo II” del cantón Ambato [Trabajo de titulación, Universidad Técnica de Ambato].

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Di Luca, P. (2025). La entrevista como instrumento para analizar patrones sociales de interpretación. XVII Congreso Internacional de Investigación y Práctica Profesional en Psicología. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Fazio, X. (2020). Reorienting curriculum for the Anthropocene. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/reorienting-curriculum-anthropocene

Fernández García, E., Zambrano Acosta, J., & Cevallos Sánchez, H. (2022). Estrategia didáctica para el fortalecimiento del aprendizaje significativo de las Ciencias Naturales. Dominio de las Ciencias, 8(3), 1015–1035. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/8637900.pdf

Jiménez, V. (2021). Triangulación metodológica cualitativa y cuantitativa. Revista sobre Estudios e Investigaciones del Saber Académico, 14, 76–81. https://doi.org/10.70833/rseisa14item276

Lopezosa, C., & Freixa Font, P. (2022). ATLAS.ti para entrevistas semiestructuradas: Guía de uso para un análisis cualitativo eficaz. https://repositori.upf.edu/items/a4b078bf-46e9-4b79-b54b-145381ae453e#page=4

Ramos-Galarza, C. (2021). Diseño de investigación experimental. Revista de Divulgación Científica de la Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, 10(1), 1–7. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7890336.pdf

Stake, R. E. (1998). Investigación con estudio de casos (5.ª ed.). Ediciones Morata.

Tacca Huamán, D. R. (2011). La enseñanza de las ciencias naturales en la educación básica. Investigación Educativa, 14(26). https://sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe/BibVirtual/Publicaciones/Inv_Educativa/2010_n26/a11.pdf

Torres Zambrano, J. F. (2026). Ambientes de aprendizaje en Ciencias Naturales en Educación Básica: Un estudio con enfoque de métodos mixtos. Mikarimin. Revista Científica Multidisciplinaria, 12(2), 19–33. https://revista.uniandes.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/mikarimin/article/view/4370/5142

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Guiracocha-Llapa, E. R., & Yunga-Coronel, K. C. (2026). The educational model for learning about natural resources in Natural Sciences in third grade. Revista UGC, 4(4), 122-128. https://revistacientifica.ugc.mx/index.php/rugc/article/view/453