Economic implications of Ecuador's external debt: Statistical analysis (1970–2024)

Authors

Keywords:

External debt, regression, economic growth

Abstract

 

External debt plays a critical role in assessing fiscal sustainability and macroeconomic stability, particularly in economies dependent on oil revenues and external financing. This study examines the evolution of Ecuador’s external debt from 1970 to 2024 through a statistical–econometric approach that integrates descriptive analysis, linear regression models and ARIMA time-series forecasting. Official historical series from the Central Bank of Ecuador and the International Monetary Fund were used, following standardized procedures for data cleaning, temporal consistency validation, and model implementation using Excel, SPSS, and RStudio. The results reveal a structurally increasing and cyclical trajectory of external debt, driven by oil price cycles, GDP volatility, and external shocks. The debt-to-GDP ratio reached a historical maximum of 81.86% in 1989 and a minimum of 18.21% in 2012, underscoring Ecuador’s high sensitivity to macroeconomic disruptions. The regression model estimated for the 1972–1978 period exhibited a strong fit (R² = 0.997), confirming that the oil boom generated a rapid and closely linked expansion of indebtedness and economic activity. ARIMA projections indicate a stabilization of the debt-to-GDP ratio around 40% for the 2025–2030 period, although the widening confidence intervals highlight increasing uncertainty related to global financial conditions and oil price volatility. The findings demonstrate that Ecuador’s external debt dynamics are shaped by structural factors associated with the r–g differential, dependence on natural resources, and limited fiscal reaction capacity. Strengthening fiscal sustainability, diversifying financing sources, and adopting countercyclical fiscal frameworks emerge as essential measures to mitigate risks stemming from external indebtedness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdellatif, M., & Lahlou, Y. (2025). Relación externa entre deuda y crecimiento en Ecuador: Un enfoque con modelos ARDL. International Journal on Science and Technology, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.71097/IJSAT.v16.i2.5754

Acosta, A. (2006). Breve historia económica del Ecuador. Corporación Editora Nacional.

Acosta, A., & Cajas, J. (2018). La deuda eterna contraataca: Cómo el correísmo nos regresó al pasado. En J. Cuvi (Ed.), El gran fraude (pp. 46–57). Montecristi Vive.

Burgo-Bencomo, O. B., López-Vera, J. G., & Morán-Molina. G. G. (2025). Economía familiar sostenible: cómo convertir la eficiencia en bienestar. Sophia Editions.

Ciaffi, G., Deleidi, M., & Di Domenico, L. (2024). Fiscal policy and public debt: Government investment is most effective to promote sustainability. Journal of Policy Modeling, 46(6), 1186–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2024.07.002

Fritz, B., & Mühlich, L. (2019). Regional financial arrangements in the global financial safety net: The Arab Monetary Fund and the Eurasian Fund for Stabilization and Development. Development and Change, 50(1), 96–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12466

González, M. J., & Hernández, M. (2023). Public Debt Sustainability and Fiscal Reaction Functions in Latin America and the Caribbean. https://publications.iadb.org/en/publications/english/viewer/Public-Debt-Sustainability-and-Fiscal-Reaction-Functions-in-Latin-America-and-the-Caribbean.pdf

Heylen, F., Mareels, M., & Van Langenhove, C. (2024). Long-run perspectives on r-g in OECD countries: An empirical analysis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 145, 103093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2024.103093

Lagoa, S. C., Leão, E. R., & Bhimjee, D. P. (2022). Dynamics of the public-debt-to-gdp ratio: can it explain the risk premium of treasury bonds?. Empirica, 49(4), 1089–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-022-09547-8

Nabieu, G., Minlah, M., & Mensah, D. (2023). Public debts, fiscal balance and sustainability: What can African governments learn from debt sustainability models? Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(2), Article 2235827. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2235827

Nagel, M., & Van Kerckhoven, S. (2025). Transformations in Latin American central banking: COVID-19 and the end of the ‘fiscal firewall’. New Political Economy, 30(5), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2025.2504404

Orlowski, L. T. (2025). The impact of the Federal Government debt on macroeconomic stability in the United States. Journal of Policy Modeling, 47(4), 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2025.06.012

Otieno, B. A., & Daniel, K. (2025). Deuda pública externa y crecimiento económico regional: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura e investigación agenda. Research in Globalization, 11, 100304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2025.100304

Parra-Cely, S., & Zanoni, W. (2024). The labor market worsening effects of a resource bust: Evidence from the crude oil price shock in Ecuador. World Development, 183, 106730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106730

Prakash, N., & Panigrahi, S. R. (2024). The impact of external debt on economic growth in emerging economies: Investigating the role of capital formation. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 19(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEP3E.2024.10056789

Rivadeneira Jaramillo, R., & Buitrón Chávez, C. R. (2017). Panorama económico de la deuda externa e interna del Ecuador periodo 2000-2016. Revista Publicando, 4(10 (2), 431-447. https://revistapublicando.org/revista/index.php/crv/article/view/505

Ross, A. (2017). La creditocracia y los argumentos para resistirse al pago de las deudas. Eudeba.

Weber, G. (2008). Sobre la deuda ilegítima. Centro de Investigaciones CIUDAD.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-01