Public management and citizen participation in the 21st century

Authors

Keywords:

Public management, citizen participation, collaborative governance, transparency, social innovation

Abstract

This article critically examines the relationship between public management and citizen participation in the 21st century, within a context marked by institutional legitimacy crises and growing demands for substantive democracy. Using a mixed-methods approach, five representative cases from Latin America and Europe are analyzed, combining document review, surveys with 500 key stakeholders, and social media network analysis. Findings indicate that participatory mechanisms with deliberative or decision-making power—such as participatory budgeting and citizens’ assemblies—have a measurable impact on government efficacy (r=0.72), whereas symbolic consultation remains a form of tokenism. Three major challenges are identified: the gap between participation and real decision-making, the structural exclusion of vulnerable groups (inclusion average = 1.9/5), and the technocratization of processes without meaningful feedback. The study argues that overcoming these limitations requires robust institutional design, transformative political will, and binding mechanisms to ensure real citizen influence. These are essential to fostering democratic, inclusive, and public-value-oriented governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Jomaira Lisbeth Gómez-Villa, Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo. Ecuador.

     

     

References

Alzás García, T., & Casa García, L. M. (2017). La evolución del concepto de triangulación en la investigación social. Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa, 5(8). https://editora.sepq.org.br/index.php/rpq/article/view/95

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 35(4), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225

Banco Mundial. (2011). La modernización del estado en América latina y el rol de los bancos de desarrollo: balance y agenda de futuro. Transformación del Estado y Desarrollo, 13. https://segib.org/wp-content/uploads/Tranformacion-EyD1.pdf#page=13

Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). Co-production: Theoretical roots and conceptual frameworks. En, V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector and co-production. (pp. 117–135). Routledge.

Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2022). Estudio Económico de América Latina y el Caribe 2022: dinámica y desafíos de la inversión para impulsar una recuperación sostenible e inclusiva. https://repositorio.cepal.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/f221aa4c-8df5-439f-aaa4-f4b1bb5c0e82/content

Cuenca Orellana, N., Dueñas Mohedas, S., & Martínez Pérez, N. (2024). “Si no enseño mi cuerpo ahora, ¿cuándo lo voy a hacer?” Corporalidad y cosificación a través de las influencers en Instagram: ZER. Revista De Estudios De Comunicación, 29(57), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1387/zer.26924

Estévez, A. M. (2005). Reflexiones teóricas sobre la corrupción: sus dimensiones política, económica y social. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 10(29), 43-86. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/290/29002904.pdf

Jirón Cevallos, J. A. (2022). Reposicionamiento ideológico en América Latina, ¿un nuevo giro político? ¿el retorno de la derecha al poder? Los casos de Argentina, Chile y Ecuador en perspectiva comparada. (Tesis de maestría). Flacso Ecuador.

Matud Aznar, M. P., Rodríguez-Wangüemert, C., & Espinoza Morales, I. (2017). Representación de mujeres y hombres en prensa española. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (72), 765-782. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1191

Nabatchi, T., & Leighninger, M. (2015). Public participation for 21st century democracy. John Wiley & Sons.

Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico. (2020), Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en

Osborne, S. (2020). Public service logic: Creating value for public service users, citizens, and society through public service delivery. Routledge.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Rosanvallon, P. (2020). El siglo del populismo: historia, teoría, crítica. Ediciones Manantial.

Salgado Salazar, I. M., & Baquero de la Calle Rivadeneira, J. (2015). Public policies with a family perspective. Colloquia: Academic Journal of Culture and Thought, 2, 17–43. https://doi.org/10.31207/colloquia.v2i0.4

Sánchez González, J. (2015). La participación ciudadana como instrumento del gobierno abierto. Espacios públicos, 18(43), 51-73. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=67642415003

Torfing, J., & Ansell, C. (2021). Co-creation: The new kid on the block in public governance. Policy & Politics, 49(2), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16115951196045

Downloads

Published

2025-08-16