Formal Models and Mathematical Thinking: Towards a Scientific Epistemology of Psychology

Authors

Keywords:

Mathematical formalization, formal models, mathematical psychology, falsification, dynamic model, Bayesian inference, clinical psychology, psychological networks, epistemology of psychology

Abstract

This essay argues that psychology requires mathematical thinking in a broad sense to strengthen its scientific character. It is argued that reducing mathematics to a purely numerical domain in school education limits the capacity for formal reasoning among professionals and students, thereby encouraging the acceptance of discourses lacking verifiable structure within clinical practice. Drawing on the distinction between verbal models and formal models, the essay demonstrates how mathematization, whether through equations, probabilistic models, logical structures, or topological frameworks, makes it possible to explicate assumptions, generate predictions, and subject hypotheses to falsification. Examples of applications are presented, including a hypothetical logistic model relating situational uncertainty to prosocial behavior, and a dynamic model inspired by nonlinear physics to describe therapist and patient interactions. The paper also discusses the feasibility of incorporating non numerical formalisms, such as those proposed in certain contemporary interpretations of psychoanalysis, within the scientific framework, provided that they are expressed as coherent and testable structures. It is concluded that mathematical formalization does not replace the human dimension of clinical practice; rather, it complements it by providing greater operational clarity, predictive capacity, and epistemological accountability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arumugam, D., Ho, M. K., Goodman, N. D., & Van Roy, B. (2024). Bayesian reinforcement learning with limited cognitive load. Open Mind, 8, 395–438. https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00132

Franco, V. R., & Iglesias, F. (2023). Invitation to mathematical psychology: Models and benefits of formal theorizing. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 39, e39515. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e39515.en

Golino, H. F., & Epskamp, S. (2016). Exploratory graph analysis: A new approach for estimating the number of dimensions in psychological research. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.02231

Goodwin, I., Hester, R., & Garrido, M. I. (2024). Temporal stability of Bayesian belief updating in perceptual decision-making. Behavior Research Methods, 56(12), 6349–6362. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02306-y

Lacan, J. (2013). Escritos 1. Siglo XXI Editores.

Liebovitch, L. S., Peluso, P. R., Norman, M. D., Su, J., & Gottman, J. M. (2011). Mathematical model of the dynamics of psychotherapy. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 5(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-011-9157-x

López Puga, J., García García, J., De la Fuente Sánchez, L., & De la Fuente Solana, E. I. (2007). Las redes bayesianas como herramientas de modelado en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 23(2), 307–316. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/167/16723218.pdf

Malkin, J., O’Donnell, C., Houghton, C. J., & Aitchison, L. (2024). Signatures of Bayesian inference emerge from energy-efficient synapses. eLife, 12, Article RP92595. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.92595

Nachiketa, A. (2019). Mathematical psychology: An approach to psychological research. Research Review International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 4(6), 1025–1030. https://old.rrjournals.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/1025-1030_RRIJM190406215.pdf

Pott, J., & Schilbach, L. (2022). Tracking and changing beliefs during social interaction: Where computational psychiatry meets cognitive behavioral therapy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1010012. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010012

Ramos, S., López-Tolsa, G. E., Martínez-Herrada, A., Molines, F., Palomino, M., & Pellón, R. (2025). Uso de modelos matemáticos como parte del análisis de datos en psicología: El caso del descuento por demora. Acción Psicológica, 22(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.22.1.43727

Rutherford, A. (2021). Mathematical thinking: For people who hate math: Level up your analytical and creative thinking skills: Excel at problem-solving and decision-making. Independently Published.

Townsend, J. T., & Neufeld, R. W. J. (2010). Introduction to special issue on contributions of mathematical psychology to clinical science and assessment. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2009.12.003

van den Ende, M. W. J., Epskamp, S., Lees, M. H., van der Maas, H. L. J., Wiers, R. W., & Sloot, P. M. A. (2022). A review of mathematical modeling of addiction regarding both (neuro-)psychological processes and the social contagion perspectives. Addictive Behaviors, 127, Article 107201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107201

Xu, Z., Hemmer, P., & Zhang, Q. (2025). Towards a generalized Bayesian model of reconstructive memory. Computational Brain & Behavior, 8(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-024-00222-8

Published

2026-06-30